Book Notes #84: What The Dog Saw by Malcolm Gladwell

Title: What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures
Author: Malcolm Gladwell
Year: 2009
Pages: 432

In What the Dog Saw, Malcolm Gladwell takes a closer look at everyday things and finds incredible stories hidden beneath the surface.

He explores underdogs, overlooked ideas, surprising successes, and unexpected failures—showing that there’s always more to the story than we think.

This book is a collection of essays originally published in The New Yorker, where Gladwell does what he does best: asks big questions and finds surprising answers.

He dives into topics like psychology, marketing, history, and social trends, making complex ideas easy to understand and fun to explore.

Gladwell’s writing is engaging and full of curiosity. Each essay gives a fresh perspective on things we usually take for granted, making us see the world in a whole new way.

Whether you’re new to his work or a longtime fan, What the Dog Saw is a fascinating and eye-opening read.

As a result, I gave this book a rating of 7.5/10.

For me, a book with a note 10 is one I consider reading again every year. Among the books I rank with 10, for example, are How to Win Friends and Influence People and Factfulness.

3 Reasons to Read What The Dog Saw

Book Overview

Malcolm Gladwell has a way of looking at the world differently, and in What the Dog Saw, he invites us to do the same.

This book is a collection of essays covering everything from infomercials and Enron to hair dye and pit bulls.

At first, these topics seem unrelated, but underneath them all is a bigger idea—how we think, how we misinterpret information, and how we often overlook what’s right in front of us.

The first section, Obsessives, Pioneers, and Minor Geniuses, introduces people who see things differently.

Take Ron Popeil, for example—he didn’t just sell products; he designed them to be irresistible.

Or Heinz ketchup, which achieved such a perfect balance of flavors that no competitor could ever replace it.

These stories remind us that great ideas aren’t always about invention—sometimes, they’re about perfecting what already works.

Then, Gladwell explores how we misunderstand information.

Whether it’s the Enron scandal or the illusion of accuracy in criminal profiling, he shows how we often mistake having more data for having better understanding.

Just because we see something doesn’t mean we interpret it correctly.

The real challenge isn’t uncovering hidden truths—it’s making sense of what’s already in front of us.

Another fascinating section looks at talent, success, and failure.

We love quick judgments—whether it’s hiring the right employee, spotting the next NFL star, or assuming intelligence leads to business success.

But time and time again, we get it wrong. Some geniuses, like Picasso, shine early, while others, like Cézanne, take years to develop. Some jobs, like teaching or investing, can’t be predicted until someone actually does them.

And the belief that talent alone guarantees success? That’s exactly what led to Enron’s downfall.

At its core, What the Dog Saw is about rethinking the way we make decisions. It challenges the idea that expertise is always reliable, that patterns always hold, and that success can be predicted with a formula.

Sometimes, the smartest thing we can do is slow down, question what we think we know, and look at things from a new perspective.

Gladwell doesn’t just tell interesting stories—he changes the way we see the world. And that’s exactly what makes this book so worth reading.

Chapter by Chapter

1. The Pitchman

Ron Popeil grew up surrounded by kitchen gadget inventors and pitchmen, learning the art of selling from his family. Unlike traditional companies, the Popeils believed that a great product was one that could sell itself with the right demonstration. Ron took this idea to a whole new level, bringing the boardwalk-style pitch to television and turning infomercials into a billion-dollar business. His most famous invention, the Showtime Rotisserie, was designed in his own kitchen—tested, tweaked, and perfected not just for performance but for how it would look in an ad. Without focus groups or consultants, he trusted his instincts, making sure his products were built for maximum visual appeal and excitement.

Popeil’s genius wasn’t just in inventing but in understanding how people buy. He knew that customers don’t just want features; they want a story, a sense of excitement, and the promise of ease. His catchy phrases like “Set it and forget it!” weren’t just slogans—they removed hesitation and made buying feel effortless. His success is a reminder that sales and product design should go hand in hand—because the best products don’t just work well; they make people want them before they even try them.

2. The Ketchup Conundrum

For decades, mustard was a one-size-fits-all condiment—until Grey Poupon came along and changed the game. It proved that customers were willing to pay more for variety and quality, leading to an explosion of different mustards on grocery store shelves. But ketchup? Ketchup never changed. No matter how many new brands tried to break in, Heinz remained king. Food scientist Howard Moskowitz, known for discovering that people prefer variety in products like spaghetti sauce, faced a puzzle: why didn’t the same rule apply to ketchup? Jim Wigon, a hopeful entrepreneur, tried to launch a premium ketchup brand, but despite great ingredients and clever marketing, it never took off.

The reason? Heinz ketchup is already perfect. Unlike other foods that benefit from variety, ketchup hits all five fundamental taste sensations—sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami—in just the right balance. It doesn’t need different flavors because it already satisfies everyone’s palate. The lesson here is that while most products thrive on variety, some achieve such a perfect balance that they leave no room for competition. Heinz didn’t just make a good ketchup; it defined what ketchup should taste like, proving that sometimes, the best innovation is simply getting it right the first time.

3. Blowing Up

This chapter follows Nassim Taleb and Victor Niederhoffer, two financial thinkers with radically different approaches to risk. Taleb built his career around expecting the unexpected, believing that catastrophic events—“Black Swans”—can wipe out fortunes in an instant. His strategy? Minimize losses and bet on rare but extreme events. Niederhoffer, on the other hand, trusted in patterns and predictability, making aggressive bets based on historical trends. He was wildly successful—until one sudden market crash wiped him out completely.

The key lesson? Risk is not about playing the odds—it’s about surviving the worst-case scenario. Niederhoffer’s mistake was assuming the past would always predict the future, while Taleb understood that markets are chaotic, and disasters are inevitable. This chapter challenges the way we think about risk, showing that true resilience isn’t about being right most of the time—it’s about never being wrong in a way that destroys you.

4. True Colors

Hair dye might seem like a simple product, but it reflects deep cultural and generational shifts. The story of Clairol and L’Oréal shows how marketing played a huge role in how women saw themselves. In the 1950s, Clairol’s famous slogan, “Does she… or doesn’t she?”, made hair dye socially acceptable by emphasizing natural beauty and subtle change. Women didn’t want to admit they dyed their hair, so Clairol made it feel discreet and effortless. Then, L’Oréal flipped the script with “Because I’m worth it”, appealing to a new generation of women who embraced bold choices and personal empowerment.

This shift highlights a bigger idea: products don’t just sell features; they sell identity. As society changed, so did the way hair dye was marketed—from shameful secret to confident self-expression. The lesson here is that understanding consumer psychology is just as important as having a great product. If you can align with how people see themselves, you’re not just selling something—they’re buying into a version of who they want to be.

5. John Rock’s Error

John Rock was a devout Catholic and a pioneering scientist—and the man responsible for developing the birth control pill. He believed that because the pill mimicked a woman’s natural cycle, it would be accepted by the Catholic Church. His logic was sound: the pill didn’t interfere with conception, it simply regulated the body’s own processes. But despite his efforts, the Church rejected it outright, leading to a deep divide between religious beliefs and medical progress.

Rock’s mistake wasn’t scientific—it was assuming that logic would change deeply held beliefs. This chapter explores how even the best arguments can fail if they don’t align with people’s values and emotions. The pill revolutionized women’s health, but its rocky reception showed that progress isn’t just about making something work—it’s about navigating the cultural and ethical landscape around it.

6. What the Dog Saw

This chapter centers on Cesar Millan, the “Dog Whisperer”, and how he seems to effortlessly control even the most unruly dogs. His secret? It’s not about training the dog—it’s about controlling his own energy and body language. Dogs don’t respond to words; they read movement, posture, and confidence. Millan’s gift is that he instinctively communicates authority in a way dogs understand, making them calm and obedient almost instantly.

The bigger idea here is about nonverbal communication and leadership. Whether dealing with dogs, people, or business, true influence comes from how you present yourself, not just what you say. Confidence, presence, and subtle cues shape how others react to us, often more than words ever could. Millan doesn’t force control—he embodies it. The takeaway? If you want to lead, inspire, or influence, it’s not just about knowledge—it’s about mastering the signals you send into the world.

7. Open Secrets

The Enron scandal was seen as a case of hidden fraud, where executives misled investors, but Gladwell argues it was something different—a mystery, not a puzzle. Unlike Watergate, where the truth was deliberately concealed, Enron’s shady deals were actually hidden in plain sight within complex financial statements. A Wall Street journalist, Jonathan Weil, first exposed Enron simply by reading its public reports and noticing that much of its supposed revenue was imaginary money from mark-to-market accounting. Investors weren’t denied information; they were overwhelmed by it, unable to make sense of what was really happening.

This case shows a bigger problem in modern intelligence and business: too much data can be just as bad as too little if people don’t have the right skills to interpret it. Gladwell argues that we treat scandals like Enron as puzzles—assuming the truth was hidden—but in reality, they are mysteries, where the challenge is understanding complex, overwhelming information. This applies to everything from intelligence failures to corporate fraud: more transparency doesn’t always mean better decisions—it can just mean more confusion.

8. Million-Dollar Murray

Murray Barr was one of the most expensive homeless people in America. A chronic alcoholic in Reno, he cycled between emergency rooms, jails, and detox centers so frequently that he cost the system over a million dollars in medical and legal bills. But here’s the twist—if the government had simply given him an apartment and full-time support, it would have cost far less than constantly treating his crises.

This chapter highlights a counterintuitive truth: solving homelessness isn’t about helping everyone equally, but about targeting the small percentage of chronically homeless people who use up the most resources. Gladwell compares this to bad cops in the LAPD—most officers had no complaints, but a tiny fraction caused almost all the problems. Instead of spreading resources thin, focusing on the extreme cases can be far more effective. The key takeaway? Sometimes, the cheapest and most effective solution is also the most controversial—just giving people what they need, even if they “don’t deserve it.”

9. The Picture Problem

When mammograms first became a standard test for breast cancer, doctors assumed more screening would lead to fewer deaths. But instead, they found that reading mammograms was more complicated than it seemed. Some tumors looked dangerous but never grew. Others seemed harmless but turned out to be lethal. The problem wasn’t a lack of data—it was that even experts struggled to interpret the images correctly.

This is part of a larger issue: more information doesn’t always mean better decisions. Whether it’s mammograms, intelligence analysis, or police investigations, we assume that having clearer pictures will lead to better conclusions. But often, like with the Enron case, the real challenge is not spotting details but knowing how to interpret them. The key lesson? We don’t just need more information—we need better ways to make sense of it.

10. Something Borrowed

When the Broadway play Frozen debuted, playwright Bryony Lavery was accused of plagiarizing passages from a psychiatrist’s book. She had lifted descriptions and insights almost word for word. But was it theft? Or was it a natural part of creativity? Lavery argued that she hadn’t stolen ideas maliciously—she had absorbed them while researching and unconsciously reproduced them in her play.

Gladwell uses this case to explore the blurred lines between inspiration and plagiarism. In art, music, and even science, borrowing is often how creativity happens—people build on the ideas of others. This challenges the way we think about originality. Instead of seeing creativity as an isolated act, it’s often the result of remixing, reinterpreting, and repackaging existing ideas. The real question isn’t just what was borrowed, but whether it was transformed into something new.

11. Connecting the Dots

After 9/11, the biggest question was: Why didn’t we see it coming? Intelligence agencies had scattered clues about the terrorists but failed to connect them in time. This chapter explores why hindsight makes everything seem obvious, even though spotting threats in real-time is far harder than it seems.

Gladwell explains that we assume that connecting information is easy, but in reality, the sheer volume of intelligence data makes it almost impossible to separate real threats from false alarms. Before 9/11, CIA and FBI analysts had the pieces but couldn’t tell which ones mattered. The key lesson? Predicting events is much harder than explaining them afterward, and our biggest mistakes come from thinking we should have seen things that were never clear at the time.

12. The Art of Failure

Why do experienced professionals choke under pressure, while amateurs sometimes rise to the occasion? Gladwell contrasts two types of failure: choking and panicking. Choking happens when skilled people overthink and lose their natural instincts, while panicking happens when someone freezes and forgets everything they know.

He uses examples from tennis, aviation, and emergency situations to show that thinking too much can be just as dangerous as thinking too little. When an expert starts second-guessing every move, their performance suffers. Meanwhile, a beginner who doesn’t overanalyze can sometimes outperform them. The lesson? When high-stakes situations arise, trusting your training and instincts is often better than overthinking.

13. Blowup

This chapter revisits catastrophic failures in finance, science, and engineering, showing how small risks can spiral into major disasters. From stock market collapses to space shuttle explosions, Gladwell explores how seemingly minor miscalculations can trigger huge, unpredictable consequences.

The key insight is that we often underestimate how interconnected and fragile complex systems are. We assume that small errors will stay small, but in tightly connected systems—like the financial markets or nuclear plants—tiny failures can snowball into catastrophic chain reactions. The takeaway? Some failures can’t be prevented by better planning—they are built into the system itself. The real challenge is designing systems that can absorb failure without collapsing.

14. Late Bloomers

Ben Fountain was a successful lawyer who left his career to become a writer, but it took him 18 years before he found literary success. His journey was slow, filled with failure, and full of trial and error—the opposite of the typical “young genius” story. His big break came with Brief Encounters with Che Guevara, but by then, he was nearly fifty. Gladwell compares Fountain to artists like Cézanne, who only achieved mastery late in life, showing that not all talent is instant—some need time to develop.

The chapter challenges the belief that brilliance must come young. Researcher David Galenson found that some artists, like Picasso, produce their best work early, while others, like Cézanne, take decades to refine their craft. Late bloomers struggle, experiment, and refine their work over time, often needing support from those around them. This raises a big question: How many potential late bloomers do we overlook because they don’t show promise right away?

15. Most Likely to Succeed

Scouting college quarterbacks is one of the hardest jobs in sports—most top picks fail in the NFL. Chase Daniel was a brilliant college quarterback, but there was no way to know if his skills would translate to the pros. Similarly, hiring great teachers is just as difficult. Standard hiring practices—looking at degrees, experience, or test scores—don’t predict who will be a great teacher.

The real lesson? Some jobs are impossible to evaluate before they start. Teaching, like quarterbacking, requires actual experience to see who thrives. Instead of relying on resumes and degrees, the best approach is apprenticeships and real-world trials. If we want to find the best teachers, we should hire more people, let them teach, and keep only the best performers—a process that sounds costly but would revolutionize education.

16. Dangerous Minds

The idea of criminal profiling sounds scientific—detectives create psychological sketches of criminals based on evidence. But Gladwell argues profiling is more art than science, often vague and eerily similar to horoscopes. The famous profiler James Brussel “predicted” details about the Mad Bomber of New York (including that he would wear a double-breasted suit when arrested). But when examined closely, his predictions were either common sense or so broad they could fit many people.

This chapter exposes the illusion of expertise. Profilers often make general statements that feel specific in hindsight. Real investigative work isn’t about “gut feelings”—it’s about hard evidence and systematic reasoning. The lesson? Be skeptical of expert claims that sound too precise to be true.

17. The Talent Myth

Many top companies obsess over hiring the smartest people, believing that talent alone drives success. But Gladwell argues that placing too much emphasis on raw talent can backfire. Enron, for example, recruited “brilliant” people, gave them free rein, and ended up with one of the biggest corporate scandals in history.

The real issue isn’t lack of intelligence but lack of structured leadership. Companies that rely too much on individual brilliance often fail to build strong systems and cultures. The key takeaway? Talent isn’t everything—how you develop and manage people matters just as much.

18. The New-Boy Network

Job interviews are often based on snap judgments, where employers form an opinion of a candidate within minutes. This is highly unreliable, yet companies keep doing it. Gladwell explores how interviewers often focus on charisma, confidence, and likeability, mistakenly assuming these qualities predict job performance.

This chapter highlights how biases influence hiring decisions. We assume we’re good at judging people quickly, but in reality, we get it wrong all the time. The lesson? Hiring decisions should rely on actual job performance, not first impressions—because great candidates don’t always “interview well.”

19. Troublemakers

Pit bulls have a reputation as dangerous dogs, but Gladwell questions whether banning them actually makes people safer. He explains that dangerous behavior isn’t about the breed—it’s about the situation. The same logic applies to crime and profiling. We often assume certain “types” of people are dangerous, but in reality, context matters far more than labels.

The broader message? We oversimplify risk, believing some traits predict danger when the real causes are much more complex. Instead of banning pit bulls, profiling criminals, or relying on stereotypes, we should look at behavior in context—because danger is never as predictable as we think.

This chapter reinforces a core idea in Outliers: success is not just about individual brilliance—it’s about systems, opportunities, and cultural legacies that shape who succeeds and who doesn’t.

4 Key Ideas From What The Dog Saw

6 Main Lessons From What The Dog Saw

My Book Highlights & Quotes

Good writing does not succeed or fail on the strength of its ability to persuade. It succeeds or fails on the strength of its ability to engage you, to make you think, to give you a glimpse into someone else’s head

Nothing frustrates me more than someone who reads something of mine or anyone else’s and says, angrily, ‘I don’t buy it.’ Why are they angry? Good writing does not succeed or fail on the strength of its ability to persuade. It succeeds or fails on the strength of its ability to engage you, to make you think, to give you a glimpse into someone else’s head—even if in the end you conclude that someone else’s head is not a place you’d really like to be

What does it say about a society that it devotes more care and patience to the selection of those who handle its money than of those who handle its children…”

The ethics of plagiarism have turned into the narcissism of small differences: because journalism cannot own up to its heavily derivative nature, it must enforce originality on the level of the sentence

Happiness, in one sense, is a function of how closely our world conforms to the infinite variety of human preference

The talent myth assumes that people make organizations smart. More often than not, it’s the other way around

Words belong to the person who wrote them

Everything that can be tested must be tested

Conclusion

The title of What the Dog Saw comes from one of the book’s 19 essays, where Gladwell explores how dogs see and understand the world—offering a unique perspective on how we perceive reality.

Throughout the book, Gladwell dives into a range of topics, including intuition, the challenges of communication, the habits of successful entrepreneurs, and the hidden meanings behind everyday objects and events.

One of the key ideas in What the Dog Saw is intuition. Gladwell examines how our brains make quick judgments and decisions with limited information, often leading to surprisingly accurate outcomes.

Through real-life examples from experts and professionals, he shows how intuitive thinking shapes the way we act, think, and view the world around us.

I am incredibly grateful that you have taken the time to read this post.

Support my work by sharing my content with your network using the sharing buttons below.

Want to show your support and appreciation tangibly?

Creating these posts takes time, effort, and lots of coffee—but it’s totally worth it!

If you’d like to show some support and help keep me stay energized for the next one, buying me a virtual coffee is a simple (and friendly!) way to do it.

Do you want to explore more?

Check my main categories of content below:

• Book Notes
• Career Development
• Essays
• Explaining
• Leadership
• Lean and Agile
• Management
• Personal Development
• Project Management
• Reading Insights
• Technology

Navigate between the many topics covered in this website:

Agile Agile Coaching Agile Transformation Art Artificial Intelligence Blockchain Books Business Business Tales C-Suite Career Coaching Communication Creativity Culture Cybersecurity Decision Making Design DevOps Digital Transformation Economy Emotional Intelligence ESG Feedback Finance Flow Focus Gaming Generative AI Goals GPT Habits Harvard Health History Innovation Kanban Large Language Models Leadership Lean Learning LeSS Machine Learning Magazine Management Marketing McKinsey Mentorship Metaverse Metrics Mindset Minimalism MIT Motivation Negotiation Networking Neuroscience NFT Ownership Paper Parenting Planning PMBOK PMI PMO Politics Portfolio Management Productivity Products Program Management Project Management Readings Remote Work Risk Management Routines Scrum Self-Improvement Self-Management Sleep Social Media Startups Strategy Team Building Technology Time Management Volunteering Web3 Work

Do you want to check previous Book Notes? Check these from the last couple of weeks:

• Book Notes #127: The Laws of Simplicity by John Maeda2025-04-04
• Book Notes #126: Inevitable by Mike Colias2025-03-24
• Book Notes #125: Revenge of the Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell2025-03-21
• Book Notes #124: Radical Candor by Kim Scott2024-09-04
• Book Notes #123: The Personal MBA by Josh Kaufman2024-05-09

Support my work by sharing my content with your network using the sharing buttons below.

Want to show your support tangibly? A virtual coffee is a small but nice way to show your appreciation and give me the extra energy to keep crafting valuable content! Pay me a coffee: