Book Notes #56: How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff

Title: How to Lie with Statistics
Author: Darrell Huff
Year: 1954
Pages: 124

Have you ever wondered if the impressive-sounding statistics we see every day are actually telling the truth—or just twisting it cleverly?

Darrell Huff’s classic book, How to Lie with Statistics, isn’t just about numbers; it’s about how easily we can be fooled if we don’t know what to look for.

It’s a witty, eye-opening guide that reveals the subtle tricks behind the stats we encounter daily, from news articles and advertisements to business presentations.

As a result, I gave this book a rating of 7.0/10.

For me, a book with a note 10 is one I consider reading again every year. Among the books I rank with 10, for example, are How to Win Friends and Influence People and Factfulness.

3 Reasons to Read How to Lie with Statistics

Book Overview

Have you ever read a statistic in a news headline or advertisement and wondered if it’s telling you the whole story—or maybe hiding something crucial?

If so, Darrell Huff’s classic book, “How to Lie with Statistics,” is exactly what you need. Written in a conversational and delightfully witty style, this book doesn’t just explain how statistics can mislead us; it turns the spotlight on the many subtle ways numbers are used to stretch the truth, shape perceptions, and sell ideas.

Huff’s central point is clear and thought-provoking: statistics aren’t inherently deceptive, but the way they’re gathered, presented, and interpreted often is. For example, he starts the book with a seemingly straightforward case about the reported income of Yale’s class of 1924. On the surface, the average income sounded impressive—but dig deeper, and you discover that this “average” was based only on the people who chose to respond to a survey, likely those proud enough of their success to share it. Immediately, you realize a statistic is only as honest as its underlying data. It’s like taking a small spoonful from a large soup pot and confidently claiming you know exactly what the whole pot tastes like.

Throughout the book, Huff uses entertaining real-life examples and humor to illustrate how easily we can be fooled. Take averages, for instance. Huff shows us how a single statistic—like the average income or average number of kids per family—can paint vastly different pictures depending on whether you choose mean, median, or mode. The choice of average isn’t just technical; it’s strategic, often chosen to support the story someone wants to tell.

Graphs and visuals don’t escape Huff’s scrutiny either. He describes the famous “gee-whiz graph,” a cleverly designed visual where a small upward tick in profit or performance is blown out of proportion simply by adjusting the graph’s scale. Suddenly, minor gains look spectacular. Huff calls attention to how subtly but powerfully visuals shape our understanding, cautioning us always to look twice at what seems impressive at first glance.

One of Huff’s most valuable contributions is his explanation of logical fallacies, especially the infamous “Post Hoc” fallacy—assuming that because one event follows another, the first must have caused the second. We’ve all heard claims like, “I took vitamin C, and then my cold went away,” but Huff gently points out the flaw: correlation doesn’t equal causation. This simple reminder can prevent countless misunderstandings in everything from personal health choices to financial investments.

He even coins the playful term “statisticulation,” describing the art of using numbers selectively or out of context to build false credibility. Huff makes it clear: a statistic can be true yet misleading, accurate yet irrelevant. It’s not always outright dishonesty; often, it’s just a careful choice of what information to show—and what to hide.

But Huff doesn’t leave us defenseless. He dedicates his final chapter to helping us fight back, arming us with essential questions to ask whenever confronted by statistics. Who collected the data? What’s missing? What’s the sample size? How was it measured? This empowering message is the heart of Huff’s work: you don’t have to be a statistician to understand statistics—you just need to know how to ask the right questions.

Ultimately, “How to Lie with Statistics” isn’t just about numbers; it’s about critical thinking, skepticism, and healthy curiosity. The book challenges our automatic trust in numbers and teaches us to approach data with thoughtful caution. Huff reminds us that in a world overflowing with statistics, the best way to protect ourselves is not just understanding numbers, but learning how to talk back to them.

Reading Huff’s book is like having coffee with a sharp, funny friend who gently pokes holes in everything you’ve ever assumed about statistics. It’s insightful, surprisingly enjoyable, and genuinely empowering—leaving you with a lasting skepticism about numbers and a newfound confidence in your own judgment. After turning the final page, you’ll never look at statistics the same way again—and perhaps that’s exactly what Huff intended.

Chapter by Chapter

Chapter 1 – The Sample with the Built-in Bias

Darrell Huff opens the book with a simple truth: a statistic is only as good as the sample behind it. If your sample is biased, everything else—your averages, charts, and headlines—is just dressed-up fiction.

He starts with a curious case: a report claiming the average income of Yale’s Class of 1924 was $25,111. It sounds impressive, but Huff quickly shows how shaky that number really is. First, it’s likely based only on the alumni who responded to a survey—people whose addresses were known and who felt comfortable sharing their income. And guess who’s most likely to answer? Those doing well. The ones who aren’t? Maybe struggling financially or simply out of touch—effectively erased from the data.

This is the chapter’s core lesson: who you ask matters. It’s easy to be dazzled by numbers, but without knowing the makeup of the sample—who was included, who wasn’t, and why—the numbers mean almost nothing. It’s like trying to guess the flavor of a whole soup based on one carefully chosen spoonful.

Huff also shows how survey bias can sneak in through design choices: people might lie (intentionally or not), misunderstand questions, or want to give socially acceptable answers. Even the person doing the asking can change the outcome. He shares a striking example: in a study about race and war, Black participants gave very different answers depending on whether the interviewer was Black or white.

In the end, this chapter reminds us to look behind the numbers. Before believing a stat, ask: “Where did this come from? Who did they ask? And who got left out?” Without those answers, even a fancy-sounding number might just be a polite way to lie.

Chapter 2 – The Well-Chosen Average

In this chapter, Darrell Huff takes a closer look at one of the most commonly used statistical tricks: the “average.” While it might sound simple, the word “average” can be dangerously misleading when not clearly defined. Huff explains that there are different types of averages—mean, median, and mode—and choosing the right one can make a huge difference in how data is presented.

Huff starts by using a relatable example: let’s say you’re buying a house in a neighborhood where the average income is reported to be $15,000. But as you read more carefully, you realize that the number is based on a mean average, which includes a few very rich people who are skewing the result. The median, on the other hand, tells you that half of the residents earn less than $3,500, which is a far more realistic picture of the neighborhood.

The trick with averages is that without specifying which one is used, the figure can be manipulated to show whatever the statistician wants. The mean can be heavily influenced by a few outliers (like millionaires in a neighborhood of low-income families), while the median gives a better sense of the “middle” of the pack, and the mode shows the most common value.

This chapter highlights how averages can easily be manipulated, whether intentionally or unintentionally, to create a more appealing or alarming picture. For instance, when businesses report their employee salaries, they might use the mean average to include their high-paid executives, which could mislead the public into thinking that the company’s overall salary structure is much better than it is.

The key takeaway here is that the term “average” needs to be looked at more closely. Without knowing which type of average is used and understanding the underlying data, you can’t really know what the statistic is telling you. Huff encourages us to ask the important question: Which average is being used, and why does it matter?

In short, this chapter helps us become smarter consumers of statistics, teaching us that the same set of numbers can tell a completely different story depending on which type of average we choose to focus on.

Chapter 3 – The Little Figures That Are Not There

In this chapter, Darrell Huff shows how seemingly innocent gaps in data can lead to misleading conclusions. He calls these missing figures “the little figures that are not there,” and they are often the key to understanding why certain statistics seem too good (or too bad) to be true.

Huff starts with a familiar example: a toothpaste advertisement that claims its product results in “23% fewer cavities” for users. At first glance, this sounds like solid proof of the toothpaste’s effectiveness. However, when you dig deeper, you find that the “23%” improvement comes from a study based on a sample of only twelve people. This small sample size means that the result could easily be a fluke, caused by random chance rather than the product itself. Huff’s point is that with a small sample, any result, even a small change, can look significant, but it might not be reliable.

To further illustrate the problem, Huff uses a simple experiment: tossing a coin. In a small number of tosses, you might get heads more often than tails (like my own test, where heads appeared 80% of the time). But if you keep tossing the coin thousands of times, you’d expect the results to even out. This is the difference between small sample sizes and larger, more reliable ones. The same principle applies to any study or statistic: small sample sizes are prone to giving exaggerated or unreliable results.

Huff also discusses how statistics can be misused in medical studies. For example, a polio vaccine study involved 450 vaccinated children and 680 unvaccinated children. The results showed no difference in polio cases between the two groups, but the sample size was too small to draw any meaningful conclusions. Only with a larger sample would the result have been more reliable.

The main takeaway from this chapter is that statistics based on small sample sizes can be easily manipulated to make a claim seem much more significant than it really is. Huff encourages us to always ask: What is the sample size? Is it large enough to draw reliable conclusions?

In short, the chapter teaches us to be skeptical of statistics that don’t give us the full picture. When key figures like sample size or the margin of error are left out, the data might be hiding more than it’s revealing.

Chapter 4 – Much Ado About Practically Nothing

In this chapter, Darrell Huff explores how statistics can make small or insignificant differences seem much more important than they really are. He highlights how numbers, especially in medical and psychological studies, are often presented in a way that exaggerates their significance.

Huff begins with a simple example: two children, Peter and Linda, take an IQ test. Peter’s score is 98, and Linda’s is 101. The obvious conclusion is that Linda is the brighter child, but Huff warns that the difference between their scores is not as significant as it appears. The IQ scores, like most other statistical results, have a margin of error. The error in these IQ scores could be as much as three points, meaning that Peter’s score could actually be anywhere from 95 to 101, and Linda’s could range from 98 to 104. So, there’s a good chance that their actual IQs could overlap, making the difference between them negligible.

This is a crucial point Huff makes: when you’re dealing with sampling or statistical results, small differences often don’t mean much. A difference that seems statistically significant might not actually matter in a practical sense. He uses the example of magazine readership surveys where a small difference, like 35% vs. 40% readership, might seem noteworthy but could be due to the small sample size or inherent errors in measurement.

Huff stresses the importance of understanding the margin of error and range when interpreting statistical data. Without knowing these details, it’s easy to be misled by results that seem precise but are actually quite vague. For example, the Old Gold cigarette company used an insignificant difference in nicotine levels to launch an ad campaign claiming their product was better, ignoring the fact that the difference was so small it had no real impact.

The big takeaway from this chapter is that we need to be cautious when interpreting statistics that highlight small differences. The chapter encourages us to ask: Is this difference meaningful, or is it just a product of statistical noise? By keeping the margin of error and range in mind, we can avoid being misled by numbers that don’t really say much.

In short, Huff teaches us to question the significance of small differences in statistics. Just because something is mathematically real doesn’t mean it’s practically important. Always look for the bigger picture and understand the context behind the numbers.

Chapter 5 – The Gee-Whiz Graph

In this chapter, Darrell Huff explores how graphs, when designed improperly, can deceive readers into thinking a statistic is more impressive or alarming than it actually is. He refers to these misleading graphs as “gee-whiz” graphs—because they are designed to make people say “Wow!” without asking whether the graph is truly accurate.

Huff begins with a simple example: a line graph showing national income growth. On its own, the graph might show a reasonable 10% increase. But Huff points out that by adjusting the graph’s scale—truncating the y-axis (the vertical line) or stretching the x-axis (the horizontal line)—the same data can appear much more dramatic. By chopping off the bottom of the graph, for example, a small rise in income can look like a huge leap.

This technique of manipulating the scale is not only deceptive, but it’s also incredibly effective. Huff uses an example from Newsweek, which published a graph showing stock prices rising to a 21-year high in 1951. However, Huff explains, the graph had been truncated at the 80% mark, making a small increase appear much larger than it actually was. This small change in scale can make a modest growth seem like an explosive boom.

Huff emphasizes that while such tricks are technically legal, they are ethically questionable. A well-designed graph should represent data clearly and fairly, without manipulating the visual representation to create a misleading impression. He notes that advertisers, corporations, and even media outlets often use this technique to sway public opinion, making their product, service, or viewpoint seem much more successful than it really is.

The takeaway from this chapter is clear: Always look carefully at the scale and range of a graph before drawing conclusions. Even well-intentioned graphs can be misleading if the scales are adjusted to exaggerate the data. Huff encourages readers to develop a healthy skepticism when confronted with graphs and visual data, questioning whether the graph is showing the true picture or merely crafting a sensational story.

In short, Huff teaches us that graphs, while powerful tools for presenting data, can also be used to manipulate the audience’s perception. Always ask: Is the graph honest, or is it making the data look better (or worse) than it really is?

Chapter 6 – The One-Dimensional Picture

In this chapter, Darrell Huff highlights how simplifying complex data into a single number or a one-dimensional picture can distort the truth. He warns against using overly simplistic representations of data, which often fail to capture the full picture of reality.

Huff starts by discussing how often we encounter data presented as a single figure or measurement—whether it’s a single number in a news article or a snapshot of a complex situation. He uses the example of companies advertising how much they’ve reduced costs. A company might claim that they’ve reduced expenses by 20%, which sounds like a huge win. But this number doesn’t tell the full story. What if the cost reductions led to lower-quality products or harmed customer service? The single figure doesn’t capture the potential negative consequences or trade-offs involved in the decision.

Huff argues that while these one-dimensional representations are easy to digest, they often leave out critical details. When complex data is boiled down to just one number or a simple chart, important nuances can be overlooked. For instance, a statistic that tells you the “average” number of children in a family might hide the fact that most families have two children, but a few large families skew the average upward. In this case, the simple statistic does not give you the whole picture of family sizes in a community.

The chapter emphasizes that data should be presented with multiple dimensions whenever possible. For example, in economic reports, it’s not enough to say that a country’s GDP grew by a certain percentage; one also needs to consider factors like income distribution, unemployment rates, and inflation to understand the true state of the economy.

Huff points out that one of the key issues with one-dimensional statistics is that they can manipulate the audience’s perception. A figure can be cherry-picked to tell a story that might not reflect the reality. For example, a company might tout its high sales growth but ignore a drop in profit margins, leaving out crucial context that would change how we view their financial health.

The main takeaway from this chapter is that data and statistics should be presented in context. Single figures are useful for quick comparisons, but they often miss the full complexity of a situation. Huff encourages readers to dig deeper and ask questions like, “What else do I need to know to understand this statistic fully?”

In short, Huff warns against the dangers of oversimplification. He encourages us to seek out richer, more nuanced representations of data—ones that show the whole story rather than just a snapshot of it. Always consider the broader context before drawing conclusions from a single number.

Chapter 7 – The Semiattached Figure

In this chapter, Darrell Huff explores the deceptive use of “semiattached figures” in statistics. These are figures or images that are presented alongside data, but whose actual relevance to the argument being made is questionable or vague. They might look convincing, but they often have little or no real connection to the topic at hand.

Huff begins by explaining how figures and illustrations can be used to make a point seem more authoritative or credible. For example, a company might show a graph of declining costs, with a picture of a happy family in the background. The image of the family is meant to suggest that the company’s cost-cutting measures are benefiting families, but there’s no actual evidence to support that claim. The family image has been “semiattached” to the data, creating a false sense of connection between the two.

One of Huff’s key examples is how advertisers will often use semiattached figures to manipulate perception. For instance, a company might use a scientific-looking graph to show how their product performs better than a competitor’s, even though the graph may not accurately represent the actual test results. The graph might be based on a legitimate study, but the way it’s presented in the ad can mislead the audience into thinking the product is much more effective than it really is.

Huff also discusses how semiattached figures can be used in political campaigns, where data and statistics are often taken out of context to support a particular agenda. Politicians or organizations will present figures that seem impressive at first glance, but upon closer inspection, it’s clear that the data doesn’t actually support the argument they are making. This could involve manipulating the way a figure is presented, or using it in a context where it’s irrelevant.

The core takeaway from this chapter is that statistics and figures need to be considered carefully, especially when they are paired with images or other persuasive elements. A semiattached figure may look convincing, but it could be hiding a lack of actual connection to the data or topic at hand. Huff urges readers to ask themselves whether the figure is truly relevant and whether it has been presented in a way that reflects its true meaning.

In short, Huff teaches us to be wary of statistics or images that seem to be strategically paired together to create a false sense of credibility. Just because a figure is accompanied by a convincing visual doesn’t mean it’s accurate or truthful. Always look at the data critically and consider whether the figure has been semiattached to make a weak argument appear strong.

Chapter 8 – Post Hoc Rides Again

In this chapter, Darrell Huff examines the classic logical fallacy of “Post Hoc,” which essentially means “after this, therefore because of this.” The fallacy occurs when someone assumes that just because one event follows another, the first event must have caused the second. Huff illustrates how this error often appears in both everyday reasoning and statistical analysis, leading to flawed conclusions.

Huff starts by giving a simple and humorous example: if a man washes his car, and the next day it rains, he might conclude that washing his car caused the rain. While this seems absurd, it’s exactly the kind of thinking that happens in the world of statistics, especially when we are looking for causal relationships where none may exist.

He then delves into how this fallacy plays out in more serious contexts, such as medicine or economics. For example, a company might release a new product, and shortly afterward, the stock price rises. A naive interpretation would be to conclude that the product caused the increase in stock price. But Huff warns that correlation doesn’t mean causation. Many other factors could have contributed to the stock price rise, such as general market conditions or unrelated news. The key point here is that just because two events occur in sequence doesn’t mean one caused the other.

Huff also gives the example of the widespread belief in the 1950s that taking vitamin C would prevent the common cold. People who took vitamin C often reported fewer colds, and many concluded that the vitamin was the cause. But Huff points out that there could be other explanations—such as the fact that people who took vitamin C might have been more health-conscious in other ways (like eating better or exercising), and that those factors contributed to their better health.

The takeaway here is that the Post Hoc fallacy is all around us, and it’s easy to fall into the trap of assuming causality where there is only correlation. Huff encourages us to ask, “Is there a real, logical connection between the events, or are we just seeing a coincidence?” We should be cautious about jumping to conclusions, especially when the evidence doesn’t fully support the causal claim.

In short, Huff reminds us to be careful about assuming causality from mere sequence. Just because one event follows another doesn’t mean the first caused the second. It’s vital to dig deeper, consider all possible explanations, and avoid jumping to conclusions based on weak evidence.

Chapter 9 – How to Statisticulate

In this chapter, Darrell Huff introduces the concept of “statisticulation,” a playful term he uses to describe the art of manipulating statistics to make them support any argument, no matter how weak or misleading. Huff demonstrates how statistics can be twisted, bent, and even fabricated to make false or questionable claims seem legitimate, all while maintaining the appearance of scientific rigor.

Huff begins by acknowledging that statistics, when used properly, can be incredibly useful in analyzing data and making informed decisions. However, when used irresponsibly or dishonestly, statistics can be incredibly powerful in shaping public perception, often in ways that obscure the truth. He explains that statisticulation involves selectively using data or choosing methods that allow someone to present a highly biased or misleading conclusion, while still making the argument appear valid.

An example Huff gives is the use of percentages and ratios in marketing and advertising. Imagine a company claims that their product reduces energy consumption by 30%. At first glance, this sounds impressive. But Huff points out that this statistic might be based on a very narrow or specific scenario—a tiny reduction in a tiny amount of energy use in a very controlled setting. In a real-world situation, the impact might be negligible. The statistic is technically true, but it’s being statisticulated to make it seem far more significant than it really is.

Huff also explores how selective data reporting—only sharing the data that supports your case—can make a weak argument appear strong. For instance, a study might show that 60% of participants saw improvements with a product, but it might be buried deep in the report that only a small number of people were tested, or that other important factors were ignored. By statisticulating in this way, the data can be used to bolster the claim, even if the underlying study is flawed.

One of the key lessons from this chapter is that, when confronted with statistics, we should always ask: How was this statistic calculated? What’s the sample size? What data was excluded? What methodology was used? Huff warns that we should never take statistics at face value, especially when they come from sources with a vested interest in making their argument look more compelling.

In short, Huff’s chapter on statisticulation shows us how statistics can be manipulated and misused to push any narrative. He encourages readers to dig deeper and to be skeptical when statistics are presented to support an argument. Just because numbers are used doesn’t mean the argument is valid. Always question the method behind the numbers, and ask whether the statistic has been statisticulated to serve a specific purpose.

Chapter 10 – How to Talk Back to a Statistic

In the final chapter of How to Lie with Statistics, Darrell Huff offers practical advice on how to respond to statistics that seem suspicious, misleading, or flawed. He emphasizes that being statistically literate isn’t just about understanding the numbers—it’s about knowing how to question, interpret, and challenge the way statistics are presented to us.

Huff begins by outlining a few key questions we should ask whenever confronted with statistics: Who collected this data? What was the sample size? Was the sample representative? What biases might have influenced the results? What is the margin of error? These questions are crucial for critically evaluating the reliability of any statistic, especially when it’s used to make a persuasive argument.

He also discusses the importance of understanding the context in which a statistic is presented. Often, statistics are taken out of context to make them seem more significant than they really are. For example, a statistic might say that “90% of people who tried this new diet lost weight,” but the context—such as the fact that the study only involved a very small, selective group of people—might render that figure meaningless. Huff encourages us to dig deeper and ask what’s missing from the statistic, as well as how it was measured.

Huff also addresses how to approach statistics that use tricky or misleading language. For instance, some statistics are presented in terms of percentages rather than actual numbers, which can make a small change sound much more dramatic. A 5% reduction in costs sounds impressive, but if it’s only a few hundred dollars, it might not be nearly as impactful as the percentage suggests. Similarly, he points out how selective comparisons can be used to distort the truth—like comparing a company’s growth rate to an industry average without considering the overall market conditions.

The central takeaway from this chapter is that the best defense against misleading statistics is asking questions. Huff emphasizes that anyone can learn how to talk back to a statistic by understanding the methods behind it and knowing how to spot common tricks and manipulations. He advocates for a more thoughtful, questioning approach to data, one that doesn’t simply accept statistics at face value.

In short, Huff’s final chapter leaves us with the tools to become more skeptical and discerning consumers of statistics. Rather than passively accepting numbers that appear on a page, we can actively challenge and question them.

By asking the right questions, seeking context, and being aware of the many ways statistics can be manipulated, we can better understand the data we encounter and avoid falling for the lies that numbers sometimes tell.

4 Key Ideas from How to Lie with Statistics

6 Main Lessons from How to Lie with Statistics

My Book Highlights & Quotes

Averages and relationships and trends and graphs are not always what they seem. There may be more in them than meets the eye, and there may be a good deal less. The secret language of statistics, so appealing in a fact-minded culture, is employed to sensationalize, inflate, confuse, and oversimplify. Statistical methods and statistical terms are necessary for reporting the mass data of social and economic trends, business conditions, “opinion” polls, and the census. But without writers who use the words with honesty and understanding and readers who know what they mean, the result can only be semantic nonsense

If the source of your information gives you also a degree of significance, you’ll have a better idea of where you stand. This degree of significance is most simply expressed as a probability… For most purposes, nothing poorer than this five percent level of significance is good enough. For some, the demanded level is one percent, which means that there are ninety-nine chances out of a hundred that an apparent difference, or whatnot, is real. Anything this likely is sometimes described as practically certain

Extrapolations are useful, particularly in that form of soothsaying called forecasting trends. But in looking at the figures or the charts made from them, it is necessary to remember one thing constantly: The trend-to-now may be a fact, but the future trend represents no more than an educated guess. Implicit in it is “everything else being equal” and “present trends continuing.” And somehow everything else refuses to remain equal, else life would be dull indeed

When you are told that something is an average you still don’t know very much about it unless you can find out which of the common kinds of average it is—mean, median, or mode

The importance of using a small group is this: With a large group any difference produced by chance is likely to be a small one and unworthy of big type. A two-peracent-improvement claim is not going to sell much tooth-paste

“The point is that when there are many reasonable explanations you are hardly entitled to pick one that suits your taste and insist on it. But many people do

The operation of a poll comes down in the end to a running battle against sources of bias, and this battle is conducted all the time by all the reputable polling organizations. What the reader of the reports must remember is that the battle is never won

The secret language of statistics, so appealing in a fact-minded culture, is employed to sensationalize, inflate, confuse, and oversimplify

There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics

Statistics can be used to prove anything that’s even remotely true

The chart may lie, but the numbers never do

Averages are often used to mislead because they are easily manipulated

A difference is a difference only if it makes a difference

A well-wrapped statistic is better than Hitler’s “big lie” it misleads, yet it cannot be pinned on you

Conclusion

If you’ve ever felt overwhelmed or misled by statistics, this book is your essential guide to understanding how easily numbers can deceive.

Huff doesn’t just show you the common pitfalls—he equips you with the tools and confidence to navigate a world full of misleading information.

Reading How to Lie with Statistics isn’t just educational; it’s empowering. It turns you into a smarter consumer of information, a better decision-maker, and a more thoughtful skeptic—exactly what you need in a data-driven world.

I am incredibly grateful that you have taken the time to read this post.

Support my work by sharing my content with your network using the sharing buttons below.

Want to show your support and appreciation tangibly?

Creating these posts takes time, effort, and lots of coffee—but it’s totally worth it!

If you’d like to show some support and help keep me stay energized for the next one, buying me a virtual coffee is a simple (and friendly!) way to do it.

Do you want to get new content in your Email?

Do you want to explore more?

Check my main categories of content below:

• Book Notes
• Career Development
• Essays
• Explaining
• Leadership
• Lean and Agile
• Management
• Personal Development
• Project Management
• Reading Insights
• Technology

Navigate between the many topics covered in this website:

Agile Agile Coaching Agile Transformation Art Artificial Intelligence Blockchain Books Business Business Tales C-Suite Career Coaching Communication Creativity Culture Cybersecurity Decision Making Design DevOps Digital Transformation Economy Emotional Intelligence ESG Feedback Finance Flow Focus Gaming Generative AI Goals GPT Habits Harvard Health History Innovation Kanban Large Language Models Leadership Lean Learning LeSS Machine Learning Magazine Management Marketing McKinsey Mentorship Metaverse Metrics Mindset Minimalism MIT Motivation Negotiation Networking Neuroscience NFT Ownership Paper Parenting Planning PMBOK PMI PMO Politics Portfolio Management Productivity Products Program Management Project Management Readings Remote Work Risk Management Routines Scrum Self-Improvement Self-Management Sleep Social Media Startups Strategy Team Building Technology Time Management Volunteering Web3 Work

Do you want to check previous Book Notes? Check these from the last couple of weeks:

• Book Notes #127: The Laws of Simplicity by John Maeda2025-04-04
• Book Notes #126: Inevitable by Mike Colias2025-03-24
• Book Notes #125: Revenge of the Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell2025-03-21
• Book Notes #124: Radical Candor by Kim Scott2024-09-04
• Book Notes #123: The Personal MBA by Josh Kaufman2024-05-09

Support my work by sharing my content with your network using the sharing buttons below.

Want to show your support tangibly? A virtual coffee is a small but nice way to show your appreciation and give me the extra energy to keep crafting valuable content! Pay me a coffee: